Category: edci335 reply

Replying to Jingjing’s Post #4

Great post! I like it that you emphasized on the usage of subtitles as a way of inclusive design. I think it can be helpful for students who have hearing problems and students in general as well because subtitles could help students take in more information then only listening to the contents. The subtitles could also be used after watching the video and serve as a reviewing material.

I wonder whether there should be more types of UDL for other students with various needs such as students with visual impairments or students who have problems reading? Would it be helpful to add some additional audios to describe certain images for video contents that are not covered in the speaking of the video?

Reply to Jin’s Post 3

Jin’s original post.

I agree with your points on that by communicating with different people we could get better learning outcomes. And apart from what you mentioned, I also think that what we already know could determine how much we could learn from a topic, but by communicating in a group work, we get to not only learn from the materials but from team members. This learning process could potentially bring us more than learning individually.

You mentioned that your learning theoretical knowledge only allows you to use them in tests and homework and that group work makes you learn from other’s experience by applying the theoretical knowledge you learned. I am curious whether you would have an example to show what you mean by this?

Reply to Jingjing’s Post 2

Jingjing’s post 2.

Hi Jingjing,

I really like your detailed explanation of inquiry-based learning and the infographic you found that demonstrates some of the ideas of this approach. The six important points you mentioned at the end of the blog sound like learning outcomes that students who learned how to use inquiry-based learning will be able to do and I think it is a nice touch because the last part could be a checking list for the readers of your blog to see whether they got the “points”.

You also mentioned in the beginning of the blog about the specific process and they all seem to have the students as the subject meaning that in this type of learning students lead their learning. I wonder where does the role of teachers or instructors come in? Or could this type of learning approach be done entirely by students? If students could do it all by themselves, what’s the difference between inquiry-based learning and self-learning?

Reply to Zhihao’s Post #1

Zhihao’s original post.

Hi Zhihao,

I really like you idea that Behaviorism focuses on the environment of the learning rather than the learners condition, while the cognitivism and constructivism encourage the learners critical thinking but sometimes can put too much pressure on them. My question is whether you think there are any difference between cognitivism and constructivism.

I think the focus of the three theories together could better support a learner’s learning process from different perspectives and enable them to both get stimulus from the environment, and encourage them to have enough critical thinking, as well as connecting the new information with their prior understanding of the old information.

Do you think there is any way to combine two or even three of the theories to help with learning?

© 2025 EDCI 335

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑